Method for crystallizing a filler in connection with a fiber web process, and an approach system for a fiber web machine

ABSTRACT

Methods are provided for crystallizing a filler, especially in order to precipitate calcium carbonate on the surfaces of solids in the short circulation of a fiber web machine by feeding carbon dioxide and lime milk to the liquid flow of the short circulation and allowing them to react with one another, is characterized in that the feed system, the mixing method and/or mixing rate of the chemicals are selected such that a size distribution of the calcium carbonate crystals suitable for the purpose is obtained. Moreover, the invention relates to an approach system for a fiber web machine applying this method, characterized in that it is provided with devices for feeding and mixing carbon dioxide and lime milk into the liquid flow at such a rate that the applicable size distribution of the calcium carbonate crystals is obtained.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of commonly owned U.S. applicationSer. No. 12/735,861, filed Aug. 20, 2010 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,480,854),which is the national phase application of International ApplicationPCT/FI2009/050138, filed Feb. 19, 2009, which designated the US andclaims benefit of FI Patent Application No. 20085166, filed Feb. 22,2008, the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated byreference.

JOINT RESEARCH

Subject matter disclosed and claimed herein was made pursuant to a jointresearch agreement between WETEND TECHNOLOGIES, OY and UPM KYMMENE OYJ.

BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY

The object of the above-mentioned invention is a method forcrystallizing a filler, especially calcium carbonate, in connection witha fiber web process, and an approach system for a fiber web machine. Theinvention especially relates to a method for continuous production ofPCC used as a filler in the production of paper and cardboard inconnection with a paper machine process.

Calcium carbonate is generally used in paper production both as a fillerand a coating material, due to factors such as the high brightness ofcarbonate and its favorable price, among other things. Calcium carbonatemay be produced by grinding either chalk, marble or lime stone, wherebyit is referred to as ground calcium carbonate, commonly abbreviated asGCC (Ground Calcium Carbonate). Another way of producing calciumcarbonate is a chemical method, in which, e.g., calcium ions present asa second component of calcium hydroxide and carbonate ions obtained whendissolving carbon dioxide in water are allowed to react, whereby theresulting calcium carbonate is precipitated from the solution ascrystals, whose shape depends on the reaction conditions, among otherthings. The final product of this production method is referred to bythe name PCC, which is an abbreviation of the words Precipitated CalciumCarbonate. This invention focuses on the production of PCC and itsspecific use as a filler in paper.

PCC production has traditionally been done separate from actual paperproduction. Until now, PCC has been produced either in its own separateplant located close to a paper mill from where the PCC slurry isconveyed by pumping trough pipelines to paper manufacture, or in asimilar plant, from where the PCC slurry is transported by tank trucksto paper mills located at a distance. PCC produced by this methodrequires the use of retention aids in the paper production, so that PCCis able to adhere to the fibers, regardless of whether they arechemically or mechanically produced cellulose fibers. The above brieflydescribed conventional way of producing PCC involves problems inaddition to the already mentioned problem related to the use ofretention aids. The transport of PCC by tank trucks to a paper mill froma chemical plant causes transport costs and requires use of dispersionagents and biocides. The use of these additives degrades the propertiesof PCC.

Construction of a separate PCC plant in connection with a factory is anexpensive investment and requires many individuals workingaround-the-clock. A PCC plant also consumes a lot of fresh water andenergy.

Thus, in order to reduce the production cost of paper, many differentproposals for producing PCC directly at a paper mill have been maderecently, thereby eliminating at least the transport costs of PCC fromthe papermaking cost structure. It has also been noticed that theproduction of PCC in the presence of fiber suspension leads to improvedadhesion of the PCC crystals to fibers, and therefore reduces at leastthe need for retention aids, and sometimes their use can even beentirely avoided. The following description discusses several patentdocuments addressing the production of PCC in connection with papermanufacture.

WO-A1-0107365 discusses the conventional PCC production method.Generally speaking, this method assumes the formation of a suspensioncontaining calcium ions, in which calcium exists both in dissolved ionform and as an insoluble solid. This suspension is supplied to apositive pressure reactor, into which gaseous carbon dioxide isintroduced, and whose content is mixed continuously. Thus, the reactionof carbon dioxide and water creates carbonate ions, whose furtherreaction with calcium ions creates calcium carbonate. The process is runon a batch-type basis according to the pH value. In the initial stage,i.e., before feeding carbon dioxide, the pH value of the suspensionpresent in the reactor is roughly above 12. Feeding carbon dioxide intothe reactor is continued until the pH drops to the 6.5-7.5 level,whereupon the PCC suspension may be pumped through a screen to a storagetank for the papermaking process.

Calcium ions originating from the process described generally above maybe either calcium oxide or calcium hydroxide. The document explains howthe burned lime (CaO) is conveyed to the PCC plant by train, truck orpneumatic pipeline from a local silo. The burnt lime is slaked by millwater in a slaker in order for calcium hydroxide to form. If required,steam may be added in order to ensure a proper reaction temperature. Thelime milk obtained from the slaker is pumped through a screen, in whichthe large-sized particles are removed, and into the aforesaid reactor.Besides the CO₂ introduced as a pure liquid into the process, anysuitable flue gas purified in an applicable manner may be used as asource of carbon dioxide being fed to the reactor. WO-A1-9935333,WO-A1-9945202 and WO-A1-0047817 discuss the protection of either groundcalcium carbonate or PCC with acid paper production in mind. Thesedocuments assume that calcium carbonate is relatively stable underalkaline conditions, and that the low pH (roughly 8 and below) tends tosplit the calcium carbonate into calcium ions and carbonate ions, sothat the suspension releases carbon dioxide, whose formation isnoticeable as stock foaming. According to the document, it was noticedthat by using carbon dioxide, whether in gaseous form or dissolved inwater, calcium carbonate may be stabilized such that the pH of the paperproduction may be reduced to within a range of 6.5-7.5 without the riskof calcium carbonate decomposing.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,223,090 discloses the precipitation of PCC in fibersoccurring at a paper mill, utilizing the hydrophilic properties ofvirgin pulp fibers by first mixing virgin pulp with lime milk andbringing the suspension with a water content of 40-95% into contact witha gaseous or liquid reagent (carbon dioxide), under vigorous mixing, ina pressurized tank in order to precipitate the filler particles in thefibers and especially their lumen. As a mixer alternative, a pressurizedpulp grinder is disclosed.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,262,006 discusses a papermaking process, where in therecycled-fiber- or reject-containing suspension there is calcium sulfateor gypsum, which is used as raw material in the paper coating. The aimof this document is to convert at least a part of the recycled plasterto calcium carbonate. This is done by supplying alkali metals orammonium carbonate to the suspension. Moreover, carbonate orhydrocarbonate ions are supplied to the paper making stock in order toform PCC, which causes the precipitation of calcium carbonate in thefibers. The carbonate ions, in turn, may be produced in a known mannerfrom lime milk and carbon dioxide by first supplying lime milk and thencarbon dioxide to the suspension. The relevant fiber suspension iseither used as such or mixed with other cellulose components for paperproduction.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,558,782, U.S. Pat. No. 5,733,461, U.S. Pat. No.5,830,364 and EP-A1-0658606 describe a process, in which alkaline earthmetal carbonate is precipitated in the papermaking filtrate, so thatcarbonate adheres to the filtrate fines, which may then be more easilyreused. In fact, the document teaches how to feed first lime milk andthen carbon dioxide to the filtrate, where the resulting PCC isprecipitated in filtrate fines. Following precipitation of PCC, eitherthe fines containing PCC are separated from the precipitate as a thickfraction, which along with another filler is supplied for addition tothe paper to be produced, or the filtrate precipitated by PCC issupplied as such to the paper production in order to be used as a filleror coating pigment.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,665,205 discusses methods aimed at improving thebrightness and purity of recycled fibers used in paper production. Itassumes the addition of calcium carbonate (calcium oxide or calciumhydroxide) and carbon dioxide to recycled fibers present in aconsistency of 0.1-5% in a mixing reactor at a temperature of 15-80° C.,the carbon dioxide and lime milk molar ratio varying between 0.1-10. Bychanging the reaction conditions, the size and shape of the calciumcarbonate crystals may be controlled. Likewise, by changing the chemicalfeed order, the reaction pH may be controlled.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,679,220 discusses the process already described above(U.S. Pat. No. 5,665,205) from slightly different angles. In thisdocument, a suspension is formed from the papermaking fiber component,whose consistency is, as above, below 5%. Lime milk is formed fromcalcium hydroxide, or the like, in a separate vessel. The fibersuspension and lime milk are mixed vigorously by shear forces, whereby astatic mixer is considered sufficient for generation of the forces, eventhough pumps and other mixers may also be considered, with a gaseousreagent in a subordinate flow reactor, whereby calcium carbonateprecipitates in the fibers. Either pure carbon dioxide or flue gases orcarbon dioxide obtained from other similar sources are used as gaseousreagents. The document proposes that lime milk and carbon dioxide besupplied to a pipe reactor in different arrangements depending on whichreactor conditions, mainly pH, are desired. Carbon dioxide may, forexample, be dosed in many different steps to the reactor.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,731,080 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,824,364 especially discussprecipitation with calcium carbonate of such a fiber suspension, whosefibers contain an ample amount of microfibrils. These microfibrils aresaid to exist in the fibers either naturally or as the result ofgrinding. In the process described in the document, the fiber suspensionis supplied in a consistency of 0.1-30% to a batch-type mixing reactor,receiving also lime milk. Preferably, the consistency of the suspensionin the reactor is roughly 2.5%. When the reactor temperature hasstabilized vigorous mixing is initiated, whereby carbon dioxide is fedto the reactor and the resulting PCC crystals precipitate on the fibersurfaces. The PCC-charged fiber suspension may be used in the paperproduction added in normal fiber suspension.

US-A1-20050045288 discusses bleached mechanical pulp and its productionsuch that yellowing characteristic of mechanical pulp does notcompromise the final product. The objective is optimal coating of themechanical pulp fibers with PCC. An essential feature of the pulpdescribed in the document is that it has been ground such that the fibersurface is well fibrillated. In the method according to the document,lime milk is added to the fiber suspension by light mechanical stirring,whereupon the consistency of the mixture is adjusted to below 10%,preferably to about 2.5%. Subsequently, gaseous carbon dioxide is addedto the diluted suspension, maintaining stronger mechanical mixing thanbefore, until all the lime milk has converted to calcium carbonate,which crystallizes in the fibers. The mixing method described above isprimarily related to mixing performed on batch-type basis in a specialcontainer. According to this document, mixing may also be performed as acontinuous process involving a pipe reactor containing the necessaryamount of static mixers. Mixing may, for example, be carried out suchthat lime milk is fed to the fiber suspension flowing in the pipe, andthen mixed by a static mixer with the stock. Subsequently, carbondioxide is fed from one or more successive points to a flow, wherebystatic mixing occurs at each point of feeding. The stock produced in themanner described above is used as one component in paper production.

WO-A1-9942657 discusses the handling of paper machine filtrate such thatthe filtrate is split in two fractions. Following fractionation, limemilk is mixed into bright filtrate, and carbon dioxide into the fractioncontaining fines and fibers. Both these fractions are supplied to acrystallization reactor, which also receives some of the fibercomponents of the paper production, and whose operation may be eithercontinuous or batch-type. In the solution disclosed in this document,the calcium carbonate going to the fraction containing the paper machinefiltrate fines and fibers is converted, when treated with carbondioxide, to calcium bicarbonate, which dissolves in the filtrate,whereupon the solids may be separated from the filtrate, if desired.Optionally, calcium bicarbonate may be precipitated back to calciumcarbonate (PCC).

WO-A1-0112899 discusses the adhesion of a mineral-based filler to acellulose suspension. The papermaking method disclosed in this documentuses a cellulose fiber suspension containing alkali and/or alkali earthmetal carbonates, bicarbonates or silicates. In this method, the mineralhydroxide is added to a fiber suspension, so that the mineral fillercarbonate may be precipitated in the fibers. The precipitation ofcarbonate is based on utilizing sodium ions. The document mentions assodium ion sources a suspension obtained in a recycled fiber process, inwhich sodium occurs as bicarbonate, or sodium naturally present in papermaking stock, or sodium obtained from ground water. In any case, sodiumions flow in the water circulation in the papermaking machine. When, forexample, calcium hydroxide is fed to a sodium-ion andbicarbonate-ion-containing fiber suspension, calcium carbonate andsodium carbonate is formed. Sodium carbonate, in turn, may react furtherwith calcium hydroxide, thereby forming calcium carbonate and sodiumhydroxide. The resulting calcium carbonate is precipitated in a knownmanner in the fibers of the fiber suspension. When the precipitationreaction has been completed, paper making stock is carried to thepapermaking machine, where carbon dioxide is fed to the obtainedprecipitate in order to control the pH value, whereby sodium hydroxideobtained as a by-product in the precipitation reaction convertsinitially to sodium carbonate and further, when reacting with carbondioxide and water, to sodium bicarbonate, whereupon the filtrate isready to be recycled for paper production.

WO-A1-02066735 discusses paper production from paper fibers and calciumcarbonate. To solve the problem in the document, an aqueous solution ofcalcium bicarbonate and/or carbon dioxide and calcium hydroxide is mixedin order to precipitate calcium carbonate as vaterite crystals, followedby immediate addition of paper fibers, whereby the vaterite crystalsconvert to calcite crystals adhering to the fibers. The paper makingstock formed in this way may be supplied to a papermaking machine inorder to produce paper.

WO-A1-03033815 refers to the document described above and discussescellulose products consisting of cellulose fibers and PCC produced inconnection with the papermaking process. According to this document, theprocess described there allows PCC to be deposited on any fiber surface,both inside and outside the fibers. The document describes a fewdifferent PCC precipitation alternatives.

In the first of the mentioned alternatives, calcium carbonate and carbondioxide are mixed in a first mixer with the fiber suspension, whoseconsistency entering the process is 3-6%, such that carbon dioxidecompletely dissolves in the suspension. Subsequently, calcium hydroxideis mixed with the suspension and the suspension mixed in a second mixer,whereby the resulting calcium carbonate precipitates in the fibers.

In the second alternative, the mixture consisting of calcium carbonateand carbon dioxide is mixed in a first mixer, whereby carbon dioxidecompletely dissolves, and at least a part of the calcium carbonateconverts to calcium bicarbonate. Finally, the mixture is fed from thefirst mixer to a second mixer, to which a fiber suspension and calciumhydroxide are also supplied, whereby the resulting calcium carbonateprecipitates in the fibers.

In the third alternative, calcium carbonate and carbon dioxide are mixedwith one another before being supplied, together with the fibersuspension, to the first mixer. This means, in practice, that a calciumbicarbonate solution is mixed with the fiber suspension. After the firstmixer, calcium hydroxide is mixed in with the fiber suspension and thesuspension supplied to a second mixer, in which calcium carbonate isformed, which precipitates in the fibers.

In the fourth alternative, PCC is precipitated in a short-fiber fractionand supplied to a mixing tank, in which the short-fiber fraction ismixed into the long-fiber fraction.

And, in the fifth alternative, PCC is precipitated in short-fiber pulp,and subsequently the short-fiber fraction is supplied to the multi-layerpaper machine headbox, whereby, for example, a product may be produced,whose middle layer is of a short-fiber fraction and the surface layersof a short-fiber or filler-containing fraction.

WO-A1-0200999 discusses a papermaking process, in which virgin pulp isadded to a flow containing at least short-fiber pulp and/or filler. Thismixture is thickened and supplied to a special reactor, where calciumand carbonate ions are added to the mixture, the ions originating from,e.g., lime milk and carbon dioxide. This flow containing short-fiberedmaterial and/or a filler may be, e.g., a filtrate from a paper machinewire section. As other short-fiber sources are mentioned variouschemicals and mechanical virgin pulp types of hardwood and softwood bothbefore and after grinding, synthetic pulps, as well as recycled fibersand rejects. According to one embodiment described in this document, theprecipitation of PCC in fibers takes place in a static mixer placed in apipe flow, to which the mixture of the short-fiber/filler-containingpulp and virgin pulp described above, dilution water and lime milk isprovided, such that the consistency of the suspension is in the 1-3.5%range. After the first static mixer, carbon dioxide is fed to this flow,which is mixed with the suspension in a second static mixer. ThePCC-charged suspension obtained from the lime is stored in anintermediate tank, from which it is conveyed in diluted form to thepapermaking machine.

EP-B1-835343 and WO-A1-03035979 discuss the production offiller-containing chemical pulp. It is based on the desired chemicalpulp being produced by mixing filler, into which PCC has beenprecipitated, with chemical pulp. This filler is obtained by grindingthe chemical or mechanical pulp such that so-called noil fibrils areproduced, whose Bauer-McNett number is about P100. Calcium carbonate ismixed with this pulp containing noil fibrils, whereupon the pulp ismixed with the chemical pulp, and the mixture dried for delivery to apaper mill.

WO-A1-02097189 discusses a calcium-containing filtrate of thepapermaking machine such that the calcium ions are unable to accumulatein the water circulation of paper production. This object is realizedsuch that the pH of the filtrate is raised to at least a value of 9without using calcium oxide or calcium hydroxide. Subsequently, carbondioxide is mixed with the process water, which precipitates asubstantial part of the calcium ions as calcium carbonate, which isremovable from the process.

WO-A1-2005005726 discusses the production of paper from paper makingstock, into which PCC has been precipitated dioxide in a special mixingdevice by utilizing lime milk and carbon dioxide.

WO-A1-2005033403 discusses a filler composition formed from a substrateand an alkali earth metal carbonate precipitated therein. The substratemay be, e.g., a paper machine filtrate containing fibers and/or fines,or even long-fiber virgin pulp. In the filler production process, solidsare first removed from lime milk, after which lime milk is combined withthe substrate, and PCC is precipitated from the mixture by means ofcarbon dioxide.

WO-A1-2005044728 describes only the production of PCC either without itsprecipitation in fibers or by precipitating it in a fiber flow leadingto the papermaking machine. The document describes how lime milk isproduced and screened free from solids, and the handling of flue gas inscrubbers and coolers, before both are carried to carbonation step at apressure of about 1-7 bars, in which PCC is produced. If desired, pulp,in which PCC is precipitated, may also be conveyed to the carbonationstep, and subsequently the pulp charged with PCC may be carried to apapermaking machine.

WO-A1-2005061386 discusses the production of PCC such that the object isto increase the crystal size and decrease the characteristic surfacearea. It is based on a mixture of lime milk and a suspension, which iscarbonated by carbon dioxide in several successive mixing reactors inorder to realize the object. The suspension may be a filtrate obtainedfrom a papermaking machine, or another appropriate solid, or asuspension containing virgin or recycled fibers. The end productresulting from the process may be used, e.g., with other fillers andadditives, as well as different fiber suspensions, in the paperproduction.

In other words, prior art teaches how to handle a paper machine filtratesuch that PCC is precipitated in the solids therein, whether they befiber-based or other particulate material, such as a filler, so that thesolids may be more easily separated from the filtrate, or such that thesolids may be utilized, e.g., as a papermaking filler.

There are also documents known in which PCC is precipitated into afraction of the paper production, which is then conveyed either as suchto a papermaking machine, or to a mixing tank for mixing with otherfractions before being conveyed to the papermaking machine.

The precipitation of PCC into a fiber-containing suspension is mostlydone according to the prior-art documents, such that calcium ions arearranged in the suspension, e.g., by means of lime milk, whereupon thesuspension is treated by a chemical, mostly carbon dioxide, releasing orforming carbon ions. Thus, calcium carbonate crystals, which adhere tothe fibers, and more specifically, to the irregularities and fibrils ontheir surface, are formed. Typically, this method is applied such thatlime milk, and only thereafter carbon dioxide, are mixed with thefiber-containing suspension.

Another option, suggested in some documents, is the so-calledbicarbonate method. In this method, carbon dioxide is mixed withliquid/filtrate/suspension containing calcium carbonate or some othersuitable carbonate, whereby the carbonate is converted to bicarbonate.When calcium or some other hydroxide suited for the purpose, e.g., limemilk, is added to the solution/suspension, carbonate is formed in thereaction of hydroxide and bicarbonate.

However, both the conventional and bicarbonate methods have their ownweaknesses. The bicarbonate method requires the use of sodium in atleast some form, which by no means is always present in the paper makingstock without separate addition. It is our understanding that inpractice the same problems appear in to the bicarbonate method as in theconventional method discussed below. The conventional method, in whichlime milk, and only thereafter carbon dioxide, are mixed first with anapplicable liquid or suspension, is not able, in our opinion, to controlthe formation of carbonate crystals in an as optimal way as is requiredin the production of more demanding products. Moreover, the rate of theprecipitation process has not been necessarily sufficient, whenattempting to perform the precipitation of PCC directly in the papermachine short circulation without a separate, longer-lasting sidecirculation.

In our opinion, the slow rate of the precipitation reactions in thepresent processes is caused by the way in which the chemicals are mixed.The prior-art solutions attempting to perform precipitation of PCC in amedium flowing in a pipe disclose that both a mere pipe flow, and eitherstatic or dynamic mixers arranged in a pipe, are sufficient for causingan adequately good mixing. However, the end result is that production ofPCC by these methods is not such that it would be ready for generalmarketing or use in paper mills.

For example, in the prior-art document U.S. Pat. No. 5,679,220 referredto above, it says that carbon dioxide is allowed to discharge into apipe mixer such that the fiber suspension flowing in the pipe sweeps upthe carbon dioxide entering the pipe, and the pipe flow in itself mixesthe carbon dioxide as small gas bubbles with the stock. In the testequipment of this US document, in which the diameter of the flow pipe isbetween half an inch and six inches, a reaction time of about one to twominutes is needed, which is altogether too long in terms of the papermachine short circulation, in which the flow velocity of the stock inthe pipe is roughly 3-6 m/s. In the mixing method according to this USdocument, the following occurs in practice, when carbon dioxide is sweptalong with the flow. After the point of adding carbon dioxide, a uniformgas wake initially forms, which slowly breaks into gas bubbles thatgradually burst further into small bubbles. However, long after feedingthe carbon dioxide, a situation prevails in which only a small part ofthe suspension liquid is able to interact immediately with the carbondioxide bubbles. This part of the liquid is very quickly saturated bycarbon dioxide resulting in slow dissolution of carbon dioxide, sincethe bubbles must be carried further in the suspension in order toencounter liquid not yet saturated by carbon dioxide.

As already briefly mentioned the slow mixing described above leads touneven size distribution of the PCC crystals, since during the wholemixing period and until at least one of the chemicals has been fullyconsumed, existing PCC crystals grow and new crystals form. Moreover, insuitable flow conditions, PCC also precipitates on the walls of the flowchannel, or the like, or on other fixed structures. This naturally isaided by the fact that the crystallization reaction is protracted,whereby far-away structures susceptible to crystallization becomeavailable.

In practice, these problems can be solved by trying to arrange asufficiently short chemical mixing time, especially reaction time. Inpractice, this means, for instance, that when an optimally evenlydispersed PCC is desired, carbon dioxide is dissolved in the liquid orsuspension flow, and only when the time needed for almost completedissolution of carbon dioxide has expired, is lime milk mixed with theflow and fed in at least an almost stoichiometric amount relative tocarbon dioxide. And, as in this case, lime milk is mixed as quickly andevenly as possible, the crystallization reaction gets to start andadvance evenly through the whole liquid, whereby crystal growth is evenand the reaction progresses quickly until completion.

French patent application FR-A1-2 821 094 describes an attempt toprecipitate PCC in stock as vaterite crystals and focuses on solving theproblem caused by unstable vaterite. In other words, it is known thatvaterite is the most unstable crystal form of calcium carbonate, whichtends to convert quickly to calcite and aragonite. Since the applicantof the document believes that the presence of vaterite in the finalproduct provides the end product with especially good properties, amethod was developed in which vaterite is formed at a sufficiently latestage for it to be sustained until the end product. The only way toensure that the production of crystals occurs sufficiently late is tofeed another source material for calcium carbonate at such a late stagethat carbonate crystals form at the desired stage. In this case, theapplicant decided to feed lime milk as close to the paper machineheadbox as possible. The document uses the term “immediately before webformation” in many different contexts for when lime milk is fed. Thepenultimate sentence of the specification in the document states thatlime milk is fed less than ten seconds before the point, when stockenters the web formation area of the papermaking machine. In otherwords, the carbonation reaction proceeds toward the end within tenseconds and the stock travels through the headbox to the paper machinewire section. The applicant therefore seems to believe that theprecipitation or crystallization reactions may proceed without a problemin the piping of the paper machine headbox.

Studies that were made, however, have shown that such late lime milkfeeding, using mixers for feeding lime milk available at the time of thepatent document, in all probability is the cause of major runnabilityproblems in a papermaking machine. The most obvious and serious of theseappear as precipitation in the headbox pipes, which instantly harms webformation. The main reason for these runnability problems andprecipitations is that for the most part, lime milk is mixed only withthe stock due to the turbulence effect existing in the flow, with theresult that the carbonation reaction continues at least in thepapermaking machine headbox, and possibly also in the paper machine wiresection. Thus, it should first be noted that the idea of using PCC asvaterite crystals, regardless of its good intention, will fail if itmeans that the crystallization reaction must proceed in the pipes of thepaper machine headbox. Second, due to the great instability of thevaterite crystals, they cannot be produced in advance, because of theirrapid conversion to more stable crystal forms.

Identifying the many problems related to the production of PCC discussedabove requires a closer look at the kinetics of the crystallizationreaction. If it is assumed that carbon dioxide is fed and at least themajority thereof also dissolved in the liquid or suspension/paper makingstock, in which PCC is preferably to be precipitated, then the PCCcrystallization or precipitation reaction will start at the time ofmixing the lime milk. The time needed for the relevant mass transfer isinfluenced by, e.g., the following two factors: The faster and moreefficiently lime milk is thoroughly mixed with the flow, the shorter thereaction time will be. Fast and efficient mixing in this step isintended to reduce as much as possible the differences of concentrationin the flow. Another important factor is the lime-milk particle size,i.e., the smaller the lime-milk particle size is, the faster is the masstransfer of the relevant particles into the liquid phase, whereby therate of the crystallization reaction obviously also increases. When thePCC starting materials are fine-grained and evenly dispersed in theliquid flow, crystallization occurs quickly and evenly through the wholeliquid flow, eliminating the possibility of forming of oversized PCCcrystals, agglomerates and precipitates. Experiments that were made haveshown that a suitable lime-milk mixing time in terms of sizedistribution for producing PCC used in conventional paper production isroughly below 3 seconds. Furthermore, when the feed, mixing and reactionzone are arranged such that the PCC precipitation reaction ceases uponsubstantially completed conversion before the desired process step,e.g., the paper machine headbox, it is ensured that harmfulprecipitation or runnability problems will not occur in the relevantprocess step and the subsequent process.

The process according to the invention may also be implemented such thatfirst lime milk, and only thereafter carbon dioxide, is mixed with aliquid or suspension (taking into account the influences of the pH valueon darkening of the stock). Experiments that were made have shown thatin a precipitation reaction carried out according to the method of theinvention, in which carbon dioxide and lime milk were fed in whicheverorder, when trying to obtain optimal PCC crystal-size distribution, thetime needed for the whole reaction, from the start of feeding thecomponent participating in the reaction until practically all the limemilk has reacted with carbon dioxide and PCC crystals have formed, inother words, substantially a 100 percent conversion has taken placebefore a desired process step, e.g., the headbox of the fiber webmachine, is below fifteen seconds, preferably below ten seconds, morepreferably below 6 seconds, and most preferably below 3 seconds. Theshorter the reaction time sought for, the quicker the mass transferneeds to be. Quick mass transfer is only obtained by arranging the feedof the latter chemical such that in practice the chemical is mixedalmost completely, immediately when the feed occurs. It is, naturally,assumed that the previously fed chemical has already been dispersed, oreven dissolved evenly through the whole liquid or suspension/papermaking stock. Another important factor in aiming for a short conversiontime is, as previously mentioned, a sufficiently fine bubble or particlesize, i.e. a large specific surface area of the chemicals in thereaction zone. The smaller the bubble or particle size (the greater thespecific surface area) is, the quicker the mass transfer from the gas orsolid material to the liquid occurs. The preferred average particle sizeof the relevant lime milk was found to be below 3 microns (μm),preferably below 1.5 microns, and most preferably below 0.5 microns. Asfor the bubble size of carbon dioxide, it should be at least below 10mm, and more preferably below 100 microns. Naturally, the optimal resultis obtained if carbon dioxide, when fed along with the liquid flow, isalready dissolved completely in the feed/injection liquid.

In theory and under certain preconditions, useful mixing methodscomprise static mixers, dynamic (rotating) mixers and injection mixers.Static mixers are suited for situations, in which all conditions areoptimal. In other words, the liquid flows to be mixed are astatic andtheir flow velocities are not too far apart from each other. Moreover,the mixer has to be specifically designed for the purpose of rapidmixing. A particular problem may be the flow resistance caused bylarge-sized mixers, the high cost of producing a mixer, or thesuitability of mixers for very few applications given their costs ofdevelopment.

Dynamic mixers are also possible, especially when relatively small flowsshould be mixed with one another. Relative differences in the flowvelocities of liquids to be mixed can be large, when the mixing volumeis kept relative small. In large-sized devices, which often comprise,e.g., the piping of a papermaking machine headbox, the investment andinstallation costs of a rotating mixer and the consumption of energy arefactors restricting their use.

Based on tests that were made, the most advantageous mixing methodrelated to the application purpose of the invention turned out to be aninjection mixer.

TrumpJet®, a feed device known from prior art and developed by WetendTechnologies Oy, is discussed in patents such as EP-B1-1064427,EP-B1-1219344, FI-B-111868, FI-B-115148 and FI-B-116473. The feed devicewas developed, due to the fact that only rotating and static mixers formixing retention agents and similar chemicals in the production of paperwere known in prior art. The devices were expensive investments in everyaspect and relatively ineffective in situations, where even mixing ofthe chemical with the headbox stock is expected, which prompted thedevelopment of, e.g., an injection mixer according to the inventionallowing for even and quick mixing of chemicals in a highlyuser-friendly device. Thus far, the functional quality of such a devicehas been measured by the resulting product, i.e., in most cases paper,as well as the amount of chemicals used. In other words, when theresulting paper quality remained unchanged or improved while the amountof chemical utilized declined, it has been inferred that chemical mixinghad improved when compared with the use of prior-art devices.

However, the injection mixer is now assumed to implement a new kind ofapplication purpose, where we are dealing with not only mixing a singlechemical with the paper making stock such that it disperses evenlytherein, when carried through the papermaking machine headbox to thewire, but with mixing two chemicals with the paper making stock, suchthat the reaction among the chemicals occurs upstream of the headbox orsome other process step.

Thus, an object of the present invention is to arrange such a shortmixing time for the chemical and the mixing itself so even throughoutthe whole liquid flow that the size distribution of the resulting PCCcrystals is as homogeneous as possible and the risk of forming ofoversized crystals, agglomerates and precipitates as little as possible.

A more specific object of the present invention is the injection of limemilk and/or carbon dioxide with the liquid or suspension flow such thatthe mixing into the flow occurs quickly and evenly, in practiceindependently the own turbulence of the flow.

When injecting carbon dioxide and/or lime milk into the flow, preferablythe TrumpJet® feed device developed by Wetend Technologies Oy andalready described above is used, so that a desired number of them may beplaced on the flow pipe circumference. When one or more feed orinjection devices are placed on the circumference of the flow pipe,depending on the size and shape of the pipe, we are actually dealingwith an injection unit covering all the injection devices placed on thesame circumference of the pipe in order to feed the same chemical. FIGS.19, 20 and 21 show results of the test, in which the operation of a feeddevice according to the prior art and the TrumpJet® feed unit iscompared, when a chemical is fed into the liquid flow. The feed deviceaccording to the prior art is a pipe fitting arranged on the flow pipecircumference, from which a chemical to be mixed is allowed to flowalong with the liquid flowing in the pipe. It can be seen from thefigures that the TrumpJet® feed unit is capable of the quick mixing setas one condition of the invention above. By using the TrumpJet® feeddevice, injection and mixing may be performed at a distance of about1-3, preferably about 1.7-2 seconds (calculated in meters, less than tenmeters) from the subsequent process step or device, while when using aprior art device the feeding the additive is to be done several tens ofmeters before the desired process step or device, e.g., the papermakingmachine headbox, so that the chemical has time to be mixed under theinfluence of the flow turbulence before the process device. The aboveapplies to situations, in which the chemical or the like should beevenly distributed before the following process step. If, however, weare dealing with a situation, in which the chemical must react with someother chemical or a substance already present in the liquid flow, thetime required by the respective reaction must naturally be reserved for,unless it is preferred to allow the respective reaction to continue inthe above-mentioned process step, e.g., the papermaking machine headbox.

Another object of the present invention is to control the PCCcrystallization in the flow solid, whereby both the size anddistribution of the carbonation crystals in the suspension may bedetermined beforehand in a relatively accurate fashion. An essential wayof realizing this object consists in injecting the PCC startingmaterials in the liquid flow such that their crystal and/or bubble sizeis suitable for the purpose.

An object of the present invention is to precipitate PCC crystals on thesurface of the fibers in the flow.

A special object of the present invention is to precipitate PCC crystalsin the hollow core, the so-called lumen of the fibers present in theflow.

In order to realize at least one of the above-mentioned objects and toaccelerate the PCC precipitation reaction the present inventiondiscloses the addition of at least one of the chemicals: lime milk andcarbon dioxide, in a bubble or particle size sufficiently fine, in afluid flowing in a pipe such that, in practice, simultaneously with theaddition of a chemical, it becomes substantially evenly mixed over thewhole cross-section area of the flow. Here, the injection should occursubstantially in transversal direction relative to the liquid flow, andwith a velocity at least three times (preferably 5-10 times) that of theliquid flow.

In our opinion, this type of mixing is especially important for carbondioxide particularly when it is the latter of chemicals to be mixed,which the prior-art methods have not been capable of mixing in theliquid or the fiber suspension so well that the carbon dioxide wouldhave dissolved quickly in the water, in practice immediately, which is arequirement for in-line PCC production to succeed on a paper-mill scale.When carbon dioxide already in its addition step is distributed over thewhole cross-section area of the flow, and carbon dioxide is not able toform at any point of the flow densification, in which the liquidsurrounding the bubble would be saturated by carbon dioxide and thedissolution of carbon dioxide prevented, but instead carbon dioxidebecomes dissolved immediately after injection.

When, according to an especially advantageous embodiment of theinvention, also lime milk is fed and mixed over the whole cross-sectionarea of the pipe flow, a situation ensues, in which the lime milk masstransfer occurs quickly, whereby calcium ions are in fact evenlydistributed through the whole liquid/suspension. Thus, their reactionwith the carbonate ions resulting from the dissolving of carbon dioxideis actually able to start simultaneously through the whole liquidvolume, in which also the originally present solid may also be assumedto be evenly distributed. In other words, the fiber flow will be treatedhomogenously and evenly. The result is that the crystal size and calciumcarbonate distribution remain even and crystals are situated evenly inthe suspension solids. If mixing is uneven and lime milk reacts stronglylocally, uncontrolled PCC crystal growth occurs, which may lead tooversized crystals and PCC agglomeration, among other things, and causeserious quality and process runnability disturbances. This may alsocause PCC to crystallize uncontrollably on the walls of the processdevices and piping causing overwhelming cleaning and process runnabilityproblems. Similarly, process controllability and adjustment is affected,and predicting the quality of the produced PCC becomes more difficult.

At least some of the weaknesses of the PCC production process accordingto the above described prior art may be remedied and at least some ofthe above-mentioned objects may be realized by a method according to theinvention for crystallizing a filler, especially calcium carbonate, in apaper machine short circulation so as to form crystals in a flowingsolid and/or on its surfaces by feeding carbon dioxide and lime milkinto a short circulation liquid flow and allowing them to react with oneanother, whereby the method is characterized in that at least eithercarbon dioxide or lime milk is fed and mixed into the liquid flow assufficiently small-sized particles or bubbles such that the chemical isspread substantially evenly in the liquid flow, regardless of the flowconditions of the liquid flow, and such that the crystallizationreaction is substantially completed in less than fifteen seconds,preferably less than ten, more preferably less than six, and mostpreferably less than three seconds, thereby realizing a sizedistribution of the homogenous calcium carbonate crystals suited for thepurpose, preventing the formation of oversized PCC crystals, PCCagglomeration and PCC precipitation, and controlling the carbon dioxideand lime milk carbonation reaction.

In quite the same way, at least some of the weaknesses of theabove-described PCC production process according to the prior art may beremedied, and at least some of the above-mentioned objects may berealized by an approach system of a fiber web machine according to theinvention, comprising at least devices for receiving filtrate from thefiber web machine, devices for producing paper making stock at leastfrom the filtrate obtained from the fiber web machine and various fiberand filler components, as well as flow piping, along with pumpingdevice(s), consisting of a plurality of flow pipes for carrying papermaking stock from its production to the headbox of the fiber webmachine, which approach system is provided with devices for feeding bothcarbon dioxide and lime milk into a liquid flow moving inside flowpiping, whereby the approach system is characterized in being providedwith a first injection unit arranged on the wall of the flow pipe forinjection of at least either lime milk or carbon dioxide into the flowpipe, substantially transversally relative to flow direction of theliquid flow.

Other characteristic features of the method according to the inventionand the approach system of the fiber web machine appear in the attachedclaims.

Advantages obtained by the method and the approach system of the fiberweb machine according to the invention over the prior-art methods arefor example:

-   -   PCC precipitation directly into the suspension flowing in the        short circulation of the fiber web machine    -   Rapid dissolution of carbon dioxide so that the PCC production        process may be connected immediately in the paper machine short        circulation    -   Quick mixing of lime milk in the suspension, quick mass transfer        from solid to liquid phase    -   Rapid carbon dioxide and lime milk reactions    -   Even mixing of the chemicals through the whole flow meaning even        and controlled formation of carbonate crystals and even        adherence of crystals to the fibers and solid    -   A simplified short-circulation process—no need at all for a        thick stock mixing tank or restriction to use a smaller-sized        tank    -   Reduction of the investments required by PCC production by at        least half compared with previously used devices    -   Reduction of the PCC production energy costs to about a tenth        when compared with the previous PCC production    -   The consumption of clean water is substantially reduced, when        compared with on-site PCC devices according to prior art    -   Paper production requires less or no retention chemicals    -   Paper production may use more fillers than previously, thereby        saving on the use of expensive fiber material    -   The need for hydrophobic glue is reduced    -   The papermaking water cycles become cleaner and/or the need for        purification chemicals is reduced, and water cycles may be        closed more than previously

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

The invention is described below in more detail in reference to theattached figures, where

FIG. 1 shows schematically a short circulation process arrangement of apapermaking machine,

FIG. 2 shows schematically a PCC production method according to priorart in the short circulation of a papermaking machine,

FIG. 3 shows schematically a second PCC production method according toprior art in the short circulation of a papermaking machine,

FIG. 4 shows schematically a short circulation process arrangementaccording to a preferred embodiment of the present invention,

FIG. 5 shows more generally the short circulation process arrangement ofFIG. 4 according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention,

FIG. 6 shows schematically a short circulation process arrangementaccording to a second preferred embodiment of the present invention,

FIG. 7 shows schematically a short circulation process arrangementaccording to a third preferred embodiment of the present invention,

FIG. 8 shows schematically a short circulation process arrangementaccording to a fourth preferred embodiment of the present invention,

FIG. 9 shows schematically a short circulation process arrangementaccording to a fifth preferred embodiment of the present invention,

FIG. 10 shows schematically a short circulation process arrangementaccording to a sixth preferred embodiment of the present invention,

FIG. 11 shows schematically a short circulation process arrangementaccording to a seventh preferred embodiment of the present invention,

FIG. 12 shows schematically a short circulation process arrangementaccording to an eighth preferred embodiment of the present invention,

FIG. 13 shows schematically a short circulation process arrangementaccording to a ninth preferred embodiment of the present invention,

FIG. 14 shows schematically a short circulation process arrangementaccording to a tenth preferred embodiment of the present invention,

FIG. 15 shows schematically a short circulation process arrangementaccording to an eleventh preferred embodiment of the present invention,

FIG. 16 shows schematically a short circulation process arrangementaccording to a twelfth preferred embodiment of the present invention,

FIG. 17 shows schematically a short circulation process arrangementaccording to a thirteenth preferred embodiment of the present invention,

FIG. 18 shows schematically a structural alternative of a preferablyused injection device in process arrangements according to theinvention,

FIGS. 19 a-19 d show an injection device according to FIG. 18 using amixing profile generated as a function of time,

FIG. 20 shows the operation of a chemical feed device according to priorart,

FIG. 21 shows the operation of a preferably used injection device in aprocess arrangement according to the invention,

FIGS. 22 and 23 show a process arrangement according to the inventionusing PCC crystals precipitated on fiber surfaces.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

It should be noted that for the sake of simplicity the section relatedto the above invention and especially the following more detailedexplanation of the invention use relatively general terms, whoseexplanations are provided below.

-   -   A papermaking machine refers more broadly to a fiber web        machine, or all web-production machines, in which a web-like        product is produced from a fiber-containing suspension. This        therefore includes besides various end products, also all        possible intermediate products.    -   Stock refers to any suspension flowing toward the headbox of a        fiber web machine, the web being formed from this suspension at        some point by a fiber web machine. Stock comprises all the        above-mentioned suspension types containing fiber even to a        minor extent.    -   A liquid flow refers to all flows, regardless of consistency,        moving in a short circulation of the fiber web machine, thus the        liquid flow may contain more or less fiber and/or various paper        production additives or fillers. A liquid flow also contains        various gas-containing suspensions and filtrates, so-called        bright and super-bright filtrates, and both thick fiber        components and pigment-containing precipitants. The term “liquid        flow” includes also secondary and partial flows, such as feed,        accept and reject flows for screening and vortex cleaning,        moving in various parts of a short circulation.    -   A fiber suspension used to produce a fiber web refers to any        suspension containing even a small amount of fiber. Thus, all        the various suspensions between the filtrate obtained from the        wire section of a fiber web machine and the final paper making        stock fed to the headbox, and including these, are suspensions        to be used in the fiber web production.    -   A processed filtrate component refers to any processing result,        including a precipitant a bright filtrate, a turbid filtrate, a        dilute filtrate containing mostly solids, or a precipitated        filtrate containing solids.    -   A fiber component refers to any fiber-containing component used        for producing a fiber web of any consistency. Thus, a fiber        component may be mechanical pulp, chemical pulp,        chemi-mechanical pulp, recycled pulp, various fiber-containing        precipitants obtained from a filtrate, and the like.    -   Injection refers to the feeding of a flowing medium to a liquid        flow using the injection liquid such that the medium to be        injected has a substantially higher flow velocity than the        liquid, whereby the medium, when injected, penetrates deep into        the liquid flow and spreads there substantially evenly        (so-called peak-to-peak dispersion below 15%-calculating the        peak-to-peak dispersion as the difference of the deviating        extreme values relative to their average). Preferably, the        injection feed velocity is around 3-15, preferably 5-10 times        the liquid flow velocity.

FIG. 1, discussing schematically a process arrangement of ashort-circulation of a prior-art papermaking machine, illustrates byreference number 2 the paper machine, where so-called white water F isobtained as the filtrate, which is carried either directly or viatreatment in intermediate tank(s) to a mixing tank, filtrate tank orwire pit 4, to which various fiber components needed in stockpreparation and additives needed in paper production are introduced.From fittings 6-12, at least one of the following is carried to a mixingtank or similar arrangement: chemical virgin pulp, mechanical virginpulp, long and/or short-fiber pulp, recycled fibers and coated rejects,uncoated rejects, a fiber fraction obtained from a recovery filter, aswell as fillers and/or additives that may be mixed already in this stepwith the paper making stock. The consistency of the fiber components issomething between three and five percent, depending on the application.Paper making stock in the mixing tank 4 is mixed of its above-mentionedcomponents to the desired composition and the consistency of theoutgoing paper making stock is adjusted within the 0.3-1.5% range,either in a separate mixing tank alone, or in a wire pit connectedthereto, or the like, to match the production of paper or more broadlyspeaking, the fiber web. Following the mixing tank 4, or generallyspeaking final dilution, the paper making stock is conveyed by a pump, aso-called mixing pump 14, to vortex cleaning in a vortex cleaning plant16, where heavier particles are separated from the paper making stock.Typically, the rejects of the first step of the vortex cleaning plantare further processed in many vortex cleaning plant steps, and in mostcases, the accept obtained from each of these is conveyed to the feed ofa previous step and the reject in to the feed of a following step, untilthe reject of the last step is removed from the short circulation. Theaccept of vortex cleaning plant 16 continues its travel to a gasseparation tank 18, where air, or possibly other gas, is removed fromthe paper making stock by vacuum so that it will not disturb the paperproduction. The level in the gas separation tank 18 is kept constant bymeans of a special weir, whereby part of paper making stock fed to thetank is returned back to the tank feed. Paper making stock flows fromthe gas separation tank 18 to a feed pump 20 of the headbox, which pumpsthe paper making stock to a so-called headbox screen 22, wherelarge-sized particles unsuited for paper production are separated fromthe paper making stock and whose accept fraction is carried topapermaking machine 2 through its headbox. The reject of headbox screen22 is processed for recovering the acceptable fiber fraction in yetanother screening step, whose accept is usually returned to the feed ofthe headbox screen. The short circulation of fiber web machinesproducing a less demanding end product may not have a vortex cleaningplant, gas separation and/or headbox screen.

FIG. 2 is a schematic depiction of a process according to prior art and,discussed in e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,387,212 for the production of PCC inconnection with the short circulation of a papermaking machine. Thefiltrate F obtained from the papermaking machine is in this processdivided by filtering 26 into two fractions, of which the bright filtrateis mixed with lime milk (Ca(OH)₂, Milk of Lime, hereafter MoL) and thesolids-containing filtrate with carbon dioxide (CO₂). Since thesolids-containing filtrate contains calcium carbonate, carbon dioxide isformed there when feeding calcium bicarbonate. Finally, both theabove-mentioned fractions and the fiber suspension are fed to a reactor28, in which calcium bicarbonate reacts with calcium hydroxide in orderto form calcium carbonate. The reaction is said to occur in aconsistency of 1-15, preferably 5-10 percent.

FIG. 3 is a schematic depiction of a second prior art proposal for PCCproduction in the approach system of a paper making machine. Thisprocess, which is dealt with in, e.g., patent document U.S. Pat. No.5,679,220, is based on a papermaking stock component or theircombination, with which lime milk and carbon dioxide are mixed. Themixing may be done either in a reactor designed especially for thispurpose or in a pipe flow. The document explains how the point of thecarbon dioxide introduction may vary relative to the lime-milk feed,making it possible, for example, to feed carbon dioxide before, as wellas after the feeding of the lime milk. Although the calcium hydroxide(lime milk) conversion reaction to calcium carbonate is said to be fast,this document, nevertheless, considered it necessary to provide aspecial reaction zone following mixing, in order to ensure fullconversion of alkaline hydroxide to carbonate. This is very important,because if the pH is too high, darkening may occur, especially of themechanical pulp. For this reaction zone, a time period of one to twominutes is given. The above reaction time, however, in a practical papermachine process is problematically long, when keeping in mind, forexample, that the paper making stock flow velocity in the approachpiping of the papermaking machine is about 5 m/s. In practice, the pipeflow available for mixing in the paper machine short circulation is atbest only some tens of meters, i.e. a tenth or less of what is proposedin the US document.

When starting to examine the reasons why the conversion reaction, whichin theory should be relatively fast, is so slow, the initial suspicionfalls on the manner in which the chemicals are mixed. In our view,clearly the biggest factor involved is the way in which carbon dioxideand lime milk is mixed, as described in the document. The documentspecifically mentions that carbon dioxide is allowed to discharge into apipe mixer such that the fiber suspension flowing in the pipe sweepsalong the carbon dioxide entering the pipe, and the pipe flow, itself,mixes carbon dioxide with paper making stock as small gas bubbles. Whenin the test equipment of this US document, in which the diameter of theflow pipe is anywhere from a half inch to six inches, a mixing/reactiontime of about one to two minutes is needed, it can only be guessed, howmuch time is needed, if the diameter of the flow pipe is clearlygreater, whereby the flow is relatively more laminar. The diameter ofthe pipeline carrying the paper making stock to the papermaking machineheadbox is, e.g., in the 500-1000 mm range, i.e., in reality thecross-sectional area is at least ten (possibly even hundred or thousand)times greater, when compared with the testing equipment of the U.S. Pat.No. 5,679,220 document. In our view, in the prior-art mixing methods,carbon dioxide is carried along with the flow such that after the pointof adding carbon dioxide, a uniform gas wake is initially formed, whichslowly breaks into gas bubbles, which further burst into smallerbubbles. However, the end result is a situation in which only a smallpart of the suspension liquid can interact immediately with the carbondioxide bubbles and be quickly saturated with carbon dioxide.Consequently, dissolution of carbon dioxide occurs slowly, since thebubbles must be carried further in the suspension in order to encounterliquid not yet saturated by carbon dioxide. Another factor affectingmixing is the consistency of the fiber suspension, since clearly ahigher suspension consistency involves a slower moving swirlingturbulence. Even, e.g., US document itself states that a consistencyabove five percent delays the gas-liquid reaction. The consistency usedin the examples of this document was 1.5%. The reactions of lime milkand carbon dioxide stemming from such an uncontrolled and weak mixingmay cause, e.g., oversized PCC crystals, PCC agglomeration and PCCprecipitation, which adhere to the flow channel or other walls, therebycausing deposits and subsequent problems with contamination. The fact,that when a large lime milk droplet reacts with carbon dioxide, aparticle having on its surface PCC is formed, the particle having insideunreacted lime milk, may also constitute a problem. At some stage, limemilk is able to gush out from this particle, raising the pH of thesuspension. When this occurs, while sufficiently many PCC particlesburst, the increased pH mixes the system.

FIG. 4 shows a PCC production process according to a preferredembodiment of the invention combined in the same way as schematicallyshown in FIG. 1 to the short circulation of a papermaking machine. Inthe method according to FIG. 4, PCC production occurs in the papermachine short circulation before the vortex cleaning plant 16. Inpractice, carbon dioxide is injected at the pressure side of pump 14,and calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)₂; lime milk), after the carbon dioxide hasdissolved a few meters from the former, in the same pipe i.e. in thefeed pipe of the first stage of the vortex cleaning plant 16. Whenensuring that a second injection feed unit i.e. the lime-milk injectionunit, is at a sufficient distance (this depends on, e.g., the lime milkparticle size and the injection feed velocity) from the vortex cleaningplant 16, the crystallization reaction will have time to be completedbefore vortex cleaning. One advantage of this embodiment is that thevortex cleaning 16 and, the machine screen 22 later on in the shortcirculation remove any oversized particles, whereas any excess gaseousCO₂ is removed in gas separator 18. It is possible to perform subsequentacidification, if the pH value needs to be adjusted, e.g., at thesuction side of the headbox feed pump 20. In other words, the chemicalsare injected in the paper making stock flow going to the papermakingmachine, where all fiber components have been already added and whoseconsistency substantially matches the headbox consistency.

FIG. 5 shows in principle a PCC production process similar to theprevious one, but a bit more schematically. In other words, startingwith FIG. 5, a representation is used, in which no consideration isgiven to which device there are present in the paper machine shortcirculation, instead it merely focuses on in which order, into whichliquid/suspension the chemicals are mixed and in which way this is done.Performed experiments have shown that the point of the short circulationat which PCC is precipitated in fibers, is not as important as the wayin which the precipitation occurs, and particularly how the chemicalsare mixed into the suspension. Furthermore, it was also shown thatparticle or bubble size has a significant effect on both the PCCproduction rate and the quality of produced PCC, particularly on thesize and size distribution of the particles to be formed. In otherwords, FIG. 5 shows only that so-called thick stock consisting ofdifferent stock fractions i.e. stock components is mixed with thefiltrate F obtained from the papermaking machine, whereupon carbondioxide and thereafter lime milk are mixed into the fiber suspension. Atthis stage, however, it is worth noting that a characteristic feature ofmost of the embodiments of our invention is that it is advantageous, inour opinion, to dissolve carbon dioxide in the available liquid beforeinjecting lime milk. At least two reasons exist for this. First, ifthick stock contains mechanical pulp or recycled pulp, consisting inpart of mechanical pulp, injecting lime milk before carbon dioxide maycause the pH value of the suspension to increase such that mechanicalpulp starts to darken. To prevent this from happening, it is safe tofirst inject carbon dioxide, whereby the suspension pH falls anddarkening will not occur. Second, the precipitation reaction occursquickly, if carbon dioxide is already dissolved in the liquid. Anotheradvantage is obtained by carbon dioxide being evenly dissolved in thewhole liquid. Thus, when lime milk is injected preferably such that itspreads quickly and evenly in the mixture through the whole suspension,evenly distributed calcium carbonate, PCC, forms on all the surfaces offibers and solids present in the suspension.

FIG. 6 shows schematically a second method of producing PCC in the shortcirculation of a papermaking machine according to a second preferredembodiment of the invention. In fact, the only feature differing fromthe previous embodiment is the order of the carbon dioxide and lime milkinjection. Such an injection system, in which lime milk is injectedfirst and only later carbon dioxide, may be relevant in our opinionunder some conditions. First, when there is not a significant amount ofmechanical pulp either as virgin pulp or recycled pulp in the fibersuspension, or when the amount of lime milk to be fed is so small thatthe pH value is not raised to a level entailing the risk of darkening.Second, it is our understanding that the injection of carbon dioxide orrather its mixing into the paper making stock must be especiallyeffective in this embodiment, so that dissolution occurs quickly andcarbon dioxide can be distributed evenly through the whole suspension,whereby the reaction with the lime milk results in a homogenous PCCformation. The practical reality, however, is that the reaction onlyadvances via the ions and thus PCC will only form gradually as carbondioxide dissolves.

FIG. 7 shows a third method of producing PCC in the short circulation ofa papermaking machine according to a third preferred embodiment of theinvention. Thick stock formed from different fiber components accordingto the figure is diluted in proper consistency by a filtrate obtainedfrom the papermaking machine, whereupon lime milk and carbon dioxide areinjected into a fiber suspension substantially simultaneously. Theinjection may be done by using a separate injection liquid, wherebycarbon dioxide dissolved in water may be used as injection liquid forlime milk or, e.g., both chemicals may be injected by using a secondarystock flow obtained from a main paper making stock pipe, or by usingsome other liquid flow of the short circulation as feed liquid. Theinjection may be performed either by nozzles common to both chemicals,or by individual nozzles for each chemical placed alternatingly on thecircumference of the flow pipe.

FIG. 8 shows a method of producing PCC in the short circulation of apapermaking machine according to a fourth preferred embodiment of theinvention. Thick paper making stock formed from different fibercomponents according to the figure is diluted to a suitable consistencyby a filtrate obtained from the papermaking machine, whereupon lime milkand carbon dioxide are injected into the paper making stocksubstantially simultaneously. In fact, the process, thus far, is thesame as the method shown in FIGS. 4 and 5. However, the process has beenclarified such that either carbon dioxide or lime milk, or preferablyboth (this alternative is shown in the figure), is/are injected in thepaper making stock by one or several mixers using specific injectionliquids. This type of mixer is described in, e.g., U.S. Pat. No.6,659,636 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,234,857 of Wetend Technologies Oy.Characteristic of the injections implemented in the differentembodiments, whether using the TrumpJet® device or some other injectiondevice, is that carbon dioxide and/or lime milk is/are injected in thepaper making stock substantially in a transversal direction relative tothe direction of paper making stock flow using an injection or feedliquid at a sufficiently high flow velocity that injectionliquids/chemical sprays of one or more nozzles cover substantially thecross-section area of the stock flow, whereby the carbon dioxide and/orlime milk is/are distributed practically evenly through the wholesuspension, regardless of the presence or absence of the turbulence inthe suspension. The above-mentioned term ‘substantially in a transversaldirection’ refers to a direction, which deviates more than 30 degreesfrom the comparison direction, e.g., from the direction of the flow orthe direction of the axis of the piping. As injection liquid the papermaking stock is used in the method of FIG. 8. In other words, the smallsecondary flow is taken from the paper making stock pipe leading to thepapermaking machine, and it is pumped to an injector, into which eitherlime milk or carbon dioxide is injected such that carbon dioxide or limemilk are mixed into the injection liquid substantially simultaneously asthe mixture of the thus formed injection liquid and carbon dioxide orlime milk penetrates the paper making stock flowing toward the headbox.The feed velocity of the injection liquid and chemical mixture is 3-15,preferably 5-10 times the velocity of the paper making stock flowing inthe stock pipe. The delay from the contact of carbon dioxide or limemilk and the injection liquid to the feed of their mixture to the papermaking stock is preferably of the order of 0-0.5 seconds. When thechemical is injected in the stock pipe in the way described above, andthe bubble or particle size of the chemical is kept sufficiently low(e.g., for lime milk, below 3 microns, preferably below 1.5 microns, andmore preferably below 0.5 microns), it can be trusted that thecarbonation reaction will be completed (full conversion has occurred) inless than fifteen seconds, preferably in less than ten seconds, morepreferably in less than six seconds, and most preferably in less thanthree seconds from the beginning of the feeding the latter chemical. Thebubble size of carbon dioxide was determined in tests to be sufficientlysmall in order to ensure rapid material transfer from the gas to theliquid when using the above-described substantially transversal feedtogether with a high feed velocity (at least three times the flowvelocity of the paper making stock). Thus, the bubble size is at leastbelow 10 mm, more preferably below 100 microns. The greater thetransversal feed velocity is, the smaller is the carbon dioxide bubblesize. Naturally, however, the optimal result is obtained if carbondioxide, when fed along with the liquid flow, is already dissolvedcompletely in the feed/injection liquid.

FIG. 9 shows a method of producing PCC in the short circulation of apapermaking machine according to a fifth preferred embodiment of theinvention. Thick paper making stock formed from different fibercomponents according to the figure is diluted to a suitable consistencyby a filtrate obtained from the papermaking machine, whereupon firstcarbon dioxide and thereafter lime milk are injected into the dilutedfiber suspension. The method according to this embodiment differs fromthe previous one in that now at least one of the chemicals is injectedinto the stock flow using as injection liquid some other liquid orsuspension than paper making stock diluted to headbox consistency. Astock component is discussed as a first injection liquid alternative.This allows several further alternatives, of course. If a stockcomponent is used as injection liquid for both chemicals, this may beeither a secondary flow obtained from the same stock component for bothchemicals, or a secondary flow obtained from its own componentseparately for each chemical, or the use of the stock component asinjection liquid as a whole, as shown in FIG. 9 for feeding carbondioxide. Furthermore, it is possible for the component used as injectionliquid to be a mixture of several stock components. It is also possiblethat the stock component, stock components, or their mixtures, has/havetheir original consistency, with which they are normally fed to themixing tank, or it/they may have been diluted to headbox consistency orsome other applicable consistency. What has been described above dependson the consistency to which the fiber suspension should originally bediluted, unless another adjustment of the consistency is desired aftermixing of the chemical(s). In other words, if the injection liquids areundiluted thick stock components, whose consistency is somewhere in the3-5% range, then the thick paper making stock should be overdiluted inthe mixing tank, so that the consistency of the final fiber suspensionwould be the desired headbox consistency. If, on the other hand, thecomponent(s) used as injection liquid is/are diluted separately toheadbox consistency, e.g., by white water from the papermaking machine,there is no need to take care of stock consistency after final chemicalmixing. Naturally, it is clear that when examining consistency, thewater coming from the lime milk to the paper making stock needs also tobe taken into consideration.

As other injection liquid alternatives, various filter fractions mayalso be used, such as, e.g., a zero water filter filler fraction, fiberrecovery filter fine fraction, zero water or some other filtrate orotherwise applicable liquid. Therefore, various secondary flows, returnflows or overflows obtained from the short circulation are alsoapplicable as feed liquid. What was mentioned above concerning theeffect of the consistency of the injection liquid naturally also appliesto these alternatives. In other words, both the consistency of theinjection liquid relative to the headbox consistency and the liquidcarried with the lime milk in the paper making stock should be takeninto account, as the liquid has its own effect on the final consistencyof the paper making stock. Also in the embodiment shown in FIG. 9, themixing method and equipment of Wetend Technologies Oy described in U.S.Pat. No. 6,659,636 U.S. Pat. No. 7,234,857 are preferably used, wherebythe delay from the mixing of the chemical and injection liquid to thefeeding of this mixture into the paper making stock is of the order of 0. . . 0.5 s. It should, however, be noticed that the greater amount ofvarious additives, or the like, the injection liquid contains, i.e. theless pure the injection liquid is, the greater is the risk that theimpurities will adversely react with the lime milk or carbon dioxide.

FIG. 10 shows a method of producing PCC in the short circulation of apapermaking machine according to a sixth preferred embodiment of theinvention. According to the Figure, thick stock formed from differentfiber components is diluted to a suitable consistency by a filtrateobtained from the papermaking machine, whereupon carbon dioxide and limemilk are injected in the paper making stock, as was in fact alreadyshown in connection with FIG. 8. In the embodiment according to thisfigure, following PCC precipitation, one or more fiber components ortheir mixture may be injected in the fiber suspension. In the injectionaccording to the embodiment shown in the figure, a secondary flowobtained from the fiber suspension moving toward the paper machineheadbox is used as injection liquid, although any liquid or suspensionmay be used. Moreover, an additive such as, e.g., starch, adhesive,etc., may also be injected in the way shown in FIG. 10 into theresulting paper making stock by the same mixer. In connection with thefeeding of additives, it is also worth noting that the use of aninjection liquid is not necessarily needed for their feed.

FIG. 11 shows a method of producing PCC in the short circulation of apapermaking machine according to a seventh preferred embodiment of theinvention. According to the figure the thick stock formed from variousfiber components is diluted to a proper consistency by a filtrateobtained from the papermaking machine, before which, first carbondioxide and thereafter lime milk are mixed with a filtrate used for thedilution and obtained from the papermaking machine. It should also benoted that in order to dissolve carbon dioxide in a filtrate, theamount, the temperature, and the pressure of the filtrate should bepreferably kept in proportion to the desired amount of carbon dioxide tobe dissolved.

FIG. 12 shows a method of producing PCC in the short circulation of apapermaking machine according to an eighth preferred embodiment of theinvention. According to the figure the thick stock formed from variousfiber components is diluted to a proper consistency by a filtrateobtained from the papermaking machine, before which, first carbondioxide and thereafter lime milk are mixed with the filtrate used forthe dilution and obtained from the papermaking machine. The differencerelative to the method shown in the embodiment of FIG. 11 is that thefiber components in this embodiment are added each as their ownfractions to the liquid flow, into which carbon dioxide and lime milkhave already been mixed. As regards the precipitation of PCC, theprocess in the figure operates in exactly the same way as the process inFIG. 11. Moreover, in this embodiment, in order to dissolve carbondioxide in the filtrate, the amount, the temperature and the pressure ofthe filtrate should be kept in proportion to the desired amount ofcarbon dioxide to be dissolved.

FIG. 13 shows a method of producing PCC in the short circulation of apapermaking machine according to a ninth preferred embodiment of theinvention. According to the figure the various fiber or additivecomponents used for preparing the paper making stock are mixed as theirown flows with the filtrate obtained from the papermaking machine. Thefigure shows an exemplary situation, in which one stock or additivecomponent is first added to the filtrate obtained from the papermakingmachine, followed by the addition of a second stock or additivecomponent along with carbon dioxide, thereafter a third stock oradditive component along with lime milk and finally, a fourth stock oradditive alone. It is, of course, obvious that if there are fewer thanfour stock or additive components, some of the components shown abovewill be left out and, if there are more than four stock or additivecomponents, more feed points will be needed, as well. Actually, two ormore stock or additive components may also be added simultaneously,which also falls within the scope of this embodiment. One preferredalternative shows a solution, in which either lime milk or carbondioxide, or both, are mixed first with a stock component. Thus, thischemical should be precision dosed into the stock component assistingboth the PCC precipitation on the exterior surface (so-calledsurface-loading) and in the fiber lumen (so-called lumen-loading). Atthe same time, it can be assumed that when actual PCC precipitationoccurs, PCC is precipitated for the most part on the surfaces of thestock component concerned. Moreover, it is possible to use as injectionliquid at a certain feed point the filtrate obtained from thepapermaking machine or a similar diluted fiber suspension, wherebybesides injecting the desired chemical, additive, stock component, orthe like, the resulting paper making stock consistency may be adjusted.In other words, it is for instance possible to use as carbon dioxideinjection liquid the filtrate obtained from the papermaking machine orwire water. As regards lime milk, it may be injected in a papermakingfiber component, if ensuring that the fiber component does not containpulp of mechanical origin or that lime milk is injected in such a smallamount that the pH of the mixture of the fiber component and lime milkwill not be able to grow too high. When simultaneously feeding lime milktogether with the fiber component being preferably, but not necessarily,mechanically ground pulp, the resulting calcium ions should be mixedwith the fiber component, so that the carbonation reaction occurs quiteon the surface of the fibers. Thus, the carbonate crystals aredistributed evenly on the fiber surface and adhere primarily on thefiber surface rather than to one another. Preferably, additions of thestock or additive component and/or carbon dioxide and lime milk is doneby injection, especially preferably by using the TrumpJet® mixing devicedescribed in the U.S. Pat. No. 6,659,636 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,234,857 ofWetend Technologies Oy.

FIG. 14 shows a method of producing PCC in the short circulation of apapermaking machine according to a tenth preferred embodiment of theinvention. In the embodiment of the figure a secondary flow is obtainedfrom the paper making stock flow, in which different fiber componentshave thus already been mixed, leading to the papermaking machine, andinto which first carbon dioxide and thereafter lime milk are injected.Furthermore, when feeding these, it is advantageous to use as feeddevice the TrumpJet® feed device of Wetend Oy.

The exemplary embodiment represented above, in which carbon dioxide andlime milk are supplied to a smaller liquid volume than in most of theprevious embodiments, in which the injection of chemicals is done into astock whole flow moving to the papermaking machine, gives reason toexplain the embodiment in somewhat more detail. Since the amount ofliquid, into which especially carbon dioxide is injected, is smaller andespecially, if the carbon dioxide amount to be fed is relatively large,it should be kept in mind that only a certain amount of carbon dioxideis able to dissolve under atmospheric or near-atmospheric conditions.Thus, if dissolving a larger amount of carbon dioxide into the secondaryflow of the embodiment described in FIG. 14 is desired, the injectionshould be done at an elevated pressure relative to the pressure in theshort circulation. In other words, a pressure in proportion to theamount of dissolved carbon dioxide has to prevail in the secondary flow.The same pressure requirement also applies, if injection of carbondioxide into a thick stock component, noils, filtrate or an additiveflow is desired. Pressurization of the secondary flow requires, e.g.,that a check valve 30 and pump 32 be arranged in the secondary line 34,as shown in FIG. 14. Pressurization of the secondary flow may beaccomplished such that the pressure of the secondary flow is high enoughto directly ensure that a sufficiently large amount of carbon dioxide isdissolved in the flow. Another alternative is to consider that whencarbon dioxide reacts with lime milk, the dissolution capacity of theliquid is in a way released, so that carbon dioxide, which is present asbubbles, continuously dissolves in the liquid. In other words, thepressure of the secondary flow need not, in practice, be raised as muchas in the first alternative.

In an eleventh preferred embodiment of the invention shown in FIG. 15,PCC is precipitated in a papermaking fiber component before mixing thecomponent with other paper making stock components. In the embodiment ofthe figure, carbon dioxide is first injected into the component eitherwithout injection liquid or by using as injection liquid, e.g., either afiltrate obtained from the papermaking machine, the same fibercomponent, in which mixing is done, or some other fiber component orapplicable stock component, or other liquid flow, whereupon lime milk isinjected into the fiber component by using as injection liquid thesecondary flow obtained from the fiber component itself. For thisembodiment, too, applies that in order to dissolve carbon dioxide in thefiber component, the amount, the temperature and the pressure of thefiber component should be in proportion to the desired amount of carbondioxide to be dissolved. In other words, the pressurization shown inFIG. 14 is a valid alternative also in this embodiment.

FIG. 16 shows a method for adding carbon dioxide or lime milk to thepaper making stock according to a twelfth preferred embodiment of theinvention. In the embodiment of the figure, the chemical (in the figure,carbon dioxide) is injected into the thick stock through one or moreinjection nozzles fastened on the wall of the flow pipe for the thickstock, before the thick stock is diluted to the consistency of the papermachine headbox. In this embodiment, the chemical is fed in veryintimate contact with the fibers, thereby obtaining very efficient PCCsurface-loading. There is also no risk of the paper making stockdarkening, in this embodiment, since the dissolution of carbon dioxidelowers pH such that the lime milk intended for subsequent mixing is nolonger able to raise pH to an extent where there would be a risk ofdarkening of the stock.

FIG. 17 shows a method according to a thirteenth preferred embodiment ofthe invention for adding carbon dioxide or lime milk to the paper makingstock. In the embodiment of the figure, the chemical (lime milk, in thefigure) is injected into the thick stock through one or more injectionnozzles fastened on the wall of the flow pipe for the thick stock,before the thick stock is diluted to the consistency of the papermachine headbox. Also in this embodiment, the physical laws pertainingto the feeding of lime milk into the paper making stock must be takeninto account. In other words, lime milk should not be injected in suchgreat amounts that the mechanical pulp present in the paper making stockor the recycled pulp containing such begins to darken. Naturally, if thepaper making stock does not contain pulp with a tendency to darken,these limitations are irrelevant. Another option for preventing papermaking stock from darkening is to feed carbon dioxide very quickly afterlime milk, so that the paper making stock will not have time to darken.

In addition to the liquid flows described in the above embodiments,either one or both PCC raw material components may be fed to, e.g.,various secondary flows, such as to the feed of the subsequent steps ofthe vortex cleaning plant, to the accept or reject, to the overflow ofthe gas separation tank or deculator, to the paper machine headboxrecirculation flow, to the headbox dilution water, to the feed or acceptof the downstream stage of the machine screen, etc.

Injection devices depicted schematically and discussed in the abovefigures are preferably devices marketed under the brand name TrumpJet®by Wetend Technologies Oy, and devices protected by, e.g., U.S. Pat.Nos. 6,659,636, 7,234,857, of which one design alternative is depictedschematically in FIG. 18. Characteristic of the operation of the devicesis that they inject an agent, a chemical or material to be mixed intothe main flow substantially in the transversal direction relative to themain flow and into a substantial part of the main flow, whereby evenmixing of the agent, chemical or material into the main flow occursfaster than is the case with any other known device. Depending on thesize of the flow pipe carrying the main flow and its cross-sectionalshape, there may be more than one injection device, e.g., four, arrangedat regular intervals on the circumference of the flow pipe. Anothersubstantial characteristic of the injection devices is that theinjection of the agent, the chemical coming out of fitting 40 or thematerial is done by using the injection liquid fed through fitting 42such that the injection liquid carries the agent to be mixed into themain flow moving in pipe 44. For example, untreated water, variousfiltrates or fiber suspensions of variable consistencies may be used asthe injection liquid. In other words, the mixers feeding lime milk andcarbon dioxide discussed above in the embodiments of the figures maypreferably use as injection liquid paper machine white water, afiber-recovery filtrate, paper making stock coming from the mixing tankand flowing to the papermaking machine, or even some papermakingfiber-containing fraction or fiber component, either diluted to theheadbox consistency or as thick. Furthermore, the feed, accept,rejection, overflow and bypass flows of various sorters, vortexcleaners, the gas separation and headbox are also applicable.

Our tests showed the most advantageous process solution to be a devicesetup, in which, through the first injection feed device unit comprisingone or more injection feed devices placed on the circumference of theflow pipe, gaseous carbon dioxide is injected by means of an injectionor feed liquid into the process liquid moving in a flow pipe at a highflow velocity and substantially transversally relative to the directionof flow of the process liquid. This is followed by the placement of asecond injection unit, comprising one or more injection devices placedquite similarly on the circumference of the flow pipe, whereby lime milkis injected in a similar manner into the process liquid at a high flowvelocity, substantially transversally to the direction of flow of theprocess liquid. In order to optimize the process, the injection unitsare spaced as close to each other as possible such that lime milk is fedto the process liquid in practice while carbon dioxide is stilldissolving in the process liquid. This procedure ensures that carbondioxide dissolves quickly, since in this case practically no part of theprocess liquid will be saturated by carbon dioxide. Since mixing of theinjection units is sufficiently effective, the whole carbon dioxide andlime milk conversion may be performed in less than fifteen, preferablyless than ten, more preferably less than six, and most preferably lessthan three seconds, counted from the moment the injection of lime milkinto the process liquid begins. The rapid reaction produces severaladvantages over the prior art. Now, that the conversion is fast andsubstantially perfect, the PCC crystals are homogenous, their sizedistribution is even, and no precipitation process will be able tostart.

FIGS. 19 a-19 d show a mixing profile obtained as a function of time byusing a device according to FIG. 18. The test equipment consists of aflow pipe (the diameter of the flow pipe in the paper machine headbox is800 mm), on whose circumference, injection devices are arranged atregular (90 degree) intervals according to FIG. 18. In the test, acolorant is injected from the injection devices into the liquid flowingin the pipe at a certain flow velocity relative to the flow velocity ofthe liquid moving in the pipe. FIG. 19 a shows the mixing status at adistance of one meter (corresponding to about 0.25 seconds) from thepoint of injecting the chemical. It can be seen that the chemicalalready covers one half of the cross section of the pipe or so, althoughthe chemical is not distributed evenly enough over the cross section ofthe pipe. FIG. 19 b shows a mixing profile, one second after feeding thechemical. It can be seen that the chemical is already distributed almostover the whole cross section of the pipe, and that the evenness of themixture still leaves room for improvement. FIG. 19 c shows a mixingprofile, two seconds after feeding the chemical. The chemical is mixedso well that the following process step or device could be positionedalready at this point. FIG. 19 d shows a mixing profile three secondsafter feeding the chemical. The mixing level keeps improving, e.g.,variations in the concentration of the solution or suspension betweenpeaks are below 10%, and the standard deviation is less than 5%.

FIG. 20 shows the operation of a prior-art feed device, in which achemical, filler, or the like, are allowed to move at a relatively lowpressure differential into the flow pipe. From the descriptor in FIG. 20(a gently downward sloping straight line starting at the point of feed)and the timeline, it can be seen that one second or so after feeding theadditive, it has only spread to a very small portion of the flowcross-section area of the flow pipe, and approximately two seconds afterfeeding the additive, it has spread, under the influence of the naturalturbulence of the flow to about a fifth of the cross-section area of theflow pipe. The lower square of the timeline depicts the mixing degree ofthe additive at the end of the timeline to the right (6 . . . 20 secondsfrom feeding). The square shows the additive to be mixed (lighter areas)as still relatively homogenous areas within the main flow. According tomeasurements, the so-called peak-to-peak variation is more than 50%.Based on practical experience, the prior-art feed device can be used, ifthe travel from the feed point to the paper machine headbox represents aflow time of about 6 . . . 20 seconds, or in meters, about 20-100meters.

FIG. 21 shows an analogous representation of a mixture resulting whenusing a TrumpJet® feed device. In the situation of the figure, fiveTrumpJet® feed devices are arranged on the circumference of the feedpipe at equal intervals in the circumferential direction, and a colorantis fed to the flow pipe at a given flow velocity relative to the flowvelocity of the liquid moving in the flow pipe. The cross section of theflow pipe below the timeline of the figure shows how already about onesecond after feeding the additive, it has spread to a substantial part(about 90%) of the cross-section area of the flow pipe. Two secondsafter feeding the additive, it has spread practically evenly in the flowand after a three second interval, the chemical has already been mixedsufficiently evenly for most applications. The square below the timelineshows the mixing degree of the additive three seconds after feeding theadditive. Peak-to-peak variation according to measurements is below the10% range, and already two seconds after feeding, below 15%. Therefore,in the conventional applications, the distance of the TrumpJet® feeddevice from the headbox need only be 5-15 meters considering that mixingoccurs to some degree also in the headbox piping. It is true, as in thepresent invention, in which even mixing is only a prerequisite for aquick and advantageous progress of the carbonation reaction, that timeneeds to be reserved for a proper reaction after the mixing, because thereaction must not continue in the headbox piping.

It was already mentioned above that in the production of PCC, injectionfeed units may be spaced relatively closely on the wall of the flowpipe. The facts shown in connection with the above FIGS. 19 and 21enable the injection feed units to be placed in the best case scenarioon the same circumference of the pipe. In other words, the injectionnozzles for carbon dioxide and lime milk are placed, e.g., alternatelyon the same circumference of the flow pipe. In such a design, it is aclear advantage if, e.g., lime milk is very finely dispersed and/orcarbon dioxide is dissolved in the injection liquid in advance. Thisbeing the case, it is clear that the injection feed units may be spacedvery closely together successively on the wall of the flow pipe. FIG. 21teaches, for example, that the lime milk injection feed unit may besituated some 1-3 seconds away from the previous carbon dioxideinjection feed unit. It should, however, be considered that it is notpossible in all conceivable circumstances to place the injection feedunits at such close intervals, but even in the worst case scenario, 15seconds or less will suffice, as calculated by means of the flowvelocity of the paper making stock moving in the flow pipe.

The injection feed units and reaction zone following such may be seen asconstituting a pipe reactor used in the production of PCC, and whosedimensions are discussed below. As was already mentioned above, thespacing in seconds between the first and second injection feed unit isbelow 15, and preferably below 3 seconds. Similarly, it was previouslymentioned that the length of the reaction zone from the feed of thelatter chemical until its substantially complete conversion to PCC, aslikewise measured by the flow velocity of the paper making stock, isbelow 15, preferably below 10, more preferably below 6, and mostpreferably below 3 seconds. In other words, the length of the pipereactor is below 30 seconds, preferably below 18 seconds, and morepreferably below 9 seconds. The length depends primarily on the chemicalfeed order (the mass transfer of lime milk is slower than that of carbondioxide), the bubble and particle size of the chemicals, and thechemicals injection velocity.

The embodiments disclosed above describe exclusively PCC precipitationto paper making stock. However, since many other additives or chemicalsalso need to be used in paper production, a few such preferred feedpoints as compared with PCC precipitation will be reviewed below.According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, all or at leastsubstantially all chemicals needed in the wet end of a papermakingmachine are dosed after the precipitation of PCC. Mainly retentionchemicals, such as polymer, bentonite, and silicate, various glues,special pigments, optical brightener and defoaming agent are relevanthere. On the other hand, in some circumstances, there is also reason tofeed a part of the chemicals before precipitation of PCC.

It can be understood from the numerous embodiments shown above that theinjections may be performed by spraying the liquid or gas to be mixedwith the flow using a specific feed or injection liquid for the flow.Furthermore, it is readily understandable that the injection or feedliquid in practice may be any liquid starting with clean water, variousclear or turbid filtrates formed in the fiber web production orprocesses in connection therewith, up to fiber suspensions or theircombinations containing various fiber components. Moreover, as feedliquid it is possible to use applicable flows obtained from varioussorting devices or vortex cleaners. As the most preferred injectionliquid, paper making stock is used.

At this stage, it is also worth noting that the objects of the presentinvention, i.e., the homogenous size distribution of the calciumcarbonate crystals, the prevention of the formation of oversized PCCcrystals, PCC agglomerations and PCC precipitations, as well as thecontrol of carbon dioxide and lime milk carbonation reaction may berealized, besides by the technique based on transversal injectiondescribed above, by a few other solutions. One alternative is to injectthe chemicals to be used in the direction of the flow pipe (i.e., eitherparallel with the flow or directly against the flow), whereby in somefashion, e.g., by placing a sufficient amount of static or dynamic(e.g., rotating or rotatable) mixing elements after the injectiondevice(s), sufficiently fast mixing is obtained as required by theinvention. A second alternative is to feed a chemical in a conventionalway, e.g., into the effective range of a rotating mechanical mixer orpump, such that the mixing efficiency is sufficient for the chemical tobe mixed evenly through the whole volume. The alternatives disclosedabove may be used for either or both chemicals (carbon dioxide and limemilk) that are to be fed.

The characteristics or the source of the chemical has not been discussedat all, yet. However, it should be noticed that the invention may useeither pure carbon dioxide or carbon dioxide separated or obtained fromthe flue gas of a CO₂ recovery plant or other similar sources. Likewise,lime milk may be produced in situ from unslaked lime or possibly broughtfrom a chemical recovery plant of a pulp mill nearby. Tests have shownthe benefits of using lime milk at process temperature (the headboxtemperature or the temperature of lime milk, e.g., either after slakingor when obtained from the recovery plant), typically 40-80° C. Warm limemilk effectively prevents, e.g., the formation of precipitations andmicrobial growth. Moreover, compared with the prior-art processes withtheir abundant use of energy for cooling, the in-line PCC productionaccording to the invention is remarkably more energy-efficient than theprior-art processes.

In connection with the various embodiments for the production of PCCshown above, e.g., the following control system may be used. The amountof filler may be considered as one criterion. In other words, when acertain amount of filler formation is desired, the dosing of eithercarbon dioxide or lime milk is determined numerically such that thedesired PCC amount is obtained. Thereafter, a second chemical feed isarranged in proportion to the second numerically determined dosing. Thisrelatively simple control system is applicable, when the amount of PCCis rather small i.e. when not attempting to dose carbon dioxide in anamount exceeding what can be dissolved in the available liquid.

If the intention is to develop a maximum amount of PCC, the continuousPCC production control system will be based on the fact that a numericalvalue is set for the upper limit of the amount of carbon dioxide to befed to the process, at which value carbon dioxide dissolves completelyin the liquid. However, it is also possible to imagine, especially in asituation, in which carbon dioxide and lime milk are injectedsubstantially simultaneously, thereby allowing them to reactimmediately, that the reaction of carbon dioxide with lime milk releasesthe dissolution capacity of carbon dioxide, potentially allowing for acarbon dioxide overdose of, e.g., around 10-20%. Of course, it must betaken into account that the solubility of carbon dioxide depends on thepressure and temperature, as well as the pH value of the liquid.However, since in a practical situation, we are operating within arelatively small pH range, the effect of pH is not included in thecontrol system. The value calculated from the stoichiometric ratio oflime milk and carbon dioxide reduced by 5% is set as the upper limit forthe amount of calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)₂) according to the calciumcarbonate production formula i.e., the amount of Ca(OH)₂ ismCa(OH)₂/mCO₂−5%=56/44−5%=1.2× the amount of CO₂. The five-percentreduction is due to the desire of always ensuring a small excessiveamount of carbon dioxide. When these allowed upper limits for the sourcematerials have been set accordingly, the set value for the amount of PCCmay be input in the control system, based on which the control systemcontrols both the lime milk and carbon dioxide feed amount. In thecalculation, the ratio between Ca(OH)₂ and CO₂ is cascade connectedrelative to one another. This means that if one or more feed amounts aretoo big with respect to the upper limits provided for the aforementionedcontrol system, the control circuit prevents the input of an excessivePCC set value. Thus, the control system may be programmed either torequest a new PCC set value or calculate a maximum allowed PCC setvalue.

The control system, furthermore, comprises that the PCC productionprocess is provided with both a measurement of pH and conductivity ofthe lime milk before the PCC production, and a measurement of the pH andconductivity of resulting PCC. The meters following the PCC productionare provided with limit values specifying that under normal conditions,PCC production should occur within a certain pH and conductivitycorridor determined depending on the application. If the limits areexceeded one way or the other, the control system will be steered towarda balanced state by adjusting the CO₂ amount. If exceeding the alarmlimits outside the limit values, an alarm is provided, and the PCCproduction control transfers to manual control. Following PCCprecipitation, the pH value is remeasured. If pH drifts upward by 0.5units relative to the previous pH measurement, the product will then beacidified either by a small amount of carbonic acid, or some other weakacid.

It is obvious from the above description, that a new process which isclearly different from the prior-art processes has been developed. Itshould be understood from the various embodiments shown above that theseby no means should be construed as limiting the invention in terms ofits scope, as disclosed in the attached claims. It is likewise clearthat the details of the various embodiments of the invention may beimplemented in other embodiments provided this is technically feasible.

The invention claimed is:
 1. An approach system of a fiber web machinecomprising: a filtrate system for obtaining a filtrate F from the fiberweb machine, a paper making stock preparation system for preparing papermaking stock from at least the filtrate F obtained from the fiber webmachine and various fiber and filler components, a flow piping systemwhich includes several flow pipes and a pumping apparatus for carryingthe paper making stock from the paper making stock preparation system toa headbox of the fiber web machine, and an injection feed system forfeeding both carbon dioxide and milk of lime into a liquid flow movingin the approach system, wherein the injection feed system includes afirst injection feed unit arranged in a wall of one of the flow pipes ofthe flow piping system for injecting an injection liquid comprised of atleast either milk of lime or carbon dioxide into one of the flow pipesof the flow piping system in a substantially transverse directionrelative to a flow direction of the liquid flow and at a feed velocityhigher than that of the liquid flow such that the mixing of the at leasteither milk of lime or carbon dioxide into the liquid flow takes placeindependently of the flow conditions of the liquid flow.
 2. The approachsystem of a fiber web machine according to claim 1, wherein theinjection feed system includes second injection feed unit which isarranged for feeding and mixing the injection liquid comprised of atleast either milk of lime or carbon dioxide into one of the flow pipes,the second injection feed unit being positioned at a distance relativeto the first injection feed unit.
 3. The approach system of a fiber webmachine according to claim 2, wherein the first and second injectionfeed units include one or more injectors attached on the wall of one ofthe flow pipes, each injector comprising an inlet fitting for receivingthe injection liquid comprised of at least either the milk of lime orcarbon dioxide, and a nozzle opening to allow the injection liquidcomprised of at least either the milk of lime or carbon dioxide to beinjected into the liquid flow.
 4. The approach system of the fiber webmachine according to claim 3, wherein the injectors comprise an inletfitting for the injection liquid.
 5. The approach system of a fiber webmachine according to claim 4, wherein the inlet fitting for theinjection liquid is arranged along a flow path in flow communicationwith a fitting arranged in the flow piping in order to obtain theinjection liquid as a secondary flow from the flow piping.
 6. Theapproach system of a fiber web machine according to claim 4, wherein theinlet fitting for the injection liquid is arranged along a flow path inflow communication with the filtrated system.
 7. The approach system ofa fiber web machine according to claim 4, wherein the inlet fitting forthe injection liquid is arranged along a flow channel in flowcommunication with a flow path for the fiber component used in theproduction of paper making stock.
 8. The approach system of a fiber webmachine according to claim 4, wherein the injection liquid is at leastone liquid selected from the group consisting of a filtrate obtainedfrom a fiber web machine, a clear or turbid filtrate obtained from afiber web machine, a fiber suspension used for producing a fiber web, afiber or other component of a fiber suspension used in the fiber webproduction, an accept flow, a reject flow, an overflow or a bypass flowof a short-circulation, and clean water.
 9. The approach system of afiber web machine according to claim 2, wherein the first and secondinjection feed units are separated by a distance which represents a flowtime of the liquid flow moving in one of the flow pipes of below 15seconds.
 10. The approach system of a fiber web machine according toclaim 9, wherein the distance between the first and second injectionfeed units represents a flow time of the liquid flow moving in one ofthe flow pipes of below 3 seconds.
 11. The approach system of a fiberweb machine according to claim 1, comprising a secondary flow pathproviding a secondary flow branching from the paper making stock flowpiping leading to the headbox, wherein the injection feed system forinjecting the injection liquid is arranged in communication with thesecondary flow path.
 12. The approach system of a fiber web machineaccording to claim 11, wherein the secondary flow path comprises a pumpand a throttle valve for pressurizing the secondary flow.
 13. Theapproach system of a fiber web machine according to claim 1, wherein theinjection feed system is attached to a pipe leading from the stockpreparation system toward a dilution unit for diluting the paper makingstock.
 14. The approach system of a fiber web machine according to claim13, wherein the injection feed system is attached to flow piping for thepaper making stock carrying diluted paper making stock to the head box.15. The approach system of a fiber web machine according claim 1,further comprising a screening system for screening paper making stock,the screening system comprising at least one of a pressure screen and avortex cleaning unit, wherein the injection feed system is positionedupstream of the screenings system.
 16. The approach system of a fiberweb machine according to claim 1, further comprising a gas separationunit for separating gas from the paper making stock, wherein theinjection feed system is positioned upstream of the gas separation unit.17. The approach system of a fiber web machine according to claim 1,wherein the liquid flow is at least one of at least one fiber component,filler component and paper making stock.